Did Blockbuster, Facebook Break Privacy Law With Beacon?

Thursday, December 13, 2007 3:00 Prime Minister PST

Recommend this story?

Please Wait...

Did and Beacon spouse go against a 1988 picture privateness protection law when film picks that Facebook members made on the latter's Web land site were made available to other members of the societal network?

According to a professor at the , the reply is a definite "yes" -- at least for Blockbuster -- and "quite possibly so" for Facebook.

"The lawsuit against Blockbuster is quite straightforward," said , associate professor at the New House Of York Law School. "I'm surprised that there haven't been lawsuits already in footing of Blockbuster. The 1 against Facebook necessitates a couple more steps. It's one of those interesting issues" that tin be viewed in multiple ways legally.

The law in inquiry is the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) of 1988. It basically forbids film lease companies such as as Blockbuster from disclosing personally identifiable lease records of the people who rent or purchase movies from them to others -- unless the client consents to the pattern in writing.

The rarely invoked law was passed after Supreme Court campaigner 's video lease records were published in a newspaper. It "stands as one of the strongest protections of consumer privateness against a specific word form of information collection," according to a on the Web site.

Civil redresses under the law include mulcts of at least US$2,500 for each violation. In the few states of affairs where the law have been invoked, the lawsuits involved the revelation of client film lease records to law enforcement government by rental companies. The law have never been tested in an online state of affairs such as as the 1 involving Blockbuster and Facebook, and could raise interesting issues, according to Grimmelmann.

Facebook's Beacon advertisement service was released in early November as a portion of the Facebook Ads platform. It is ostensibly designed to track the activities of Facebook users on more than than 44 participating Web land sites and to describe those activities to the users' Facebook friends, unless specifically told not to make so. The thought is to give participating online companies a manner to supervise the activities of Facebook users on their Web land sites and to utilize that information to then present targeted messages to Facebook friends.

The job with that arrangement, at least for Blockbuster, is that such as information sharing set it in misdemeanor of VPPA before Facebook changed its privateness policies following an call over Beacon, Grimmelmann said. The mere fact that Blockbuster passed on film pick information to Facebook friends without user consent is a misdemeanor of VPPA, he said. That information exchange between Blockbuster and Facebook took topographic point in the background without the Facebook user's knowledge, even though the user's consent might have got got got been needed for it to have been shared with other Facebook members, he said.

It is less clear what, if any, blameworthiness Facebook might have, he said. Under civil wrong law, it could be argued that this was a joint endeavor and since Blockbuster is liable, Facebook is, too, Grimmelmann said. Even so, Facebook have a "much better argument" than Blockbuster, he said.

Neither Blockbuster nor Facebook responded immediately to a petition for remark on Grimmelmann's assertions.

Grimmelmann in his blog earlier this week.